|
Maybe it’s because I
spent twenty-three years in an assembly plant, but to me good ergonomics
is good sense.
Derrick Quinney
Safety & Health Director
Michigan AFL-CIO
Ergonomics in the states
The fight for ergonomic
standards lost ground in 2003 with the repeal of Washington state’s
ergonomics rule.
The Washington state
ergonomics rule became law in 1998, and each year business friendly
legislators launched an attempt to repeal it. In 2003 such a measure
passed the state Senate with several Democrats supporting it. The
governor, however, threatened to veto the bill and it died. Washington
industry groups turned to the ballot box, spending an estimated $1.5
million to get the initiative on the ballot and passed into law with 53%
support. Peg Seminario, AFL-CIO safety director, says corporate backers of
the referendum "lied about the rule from the beginning" and
succeeded in portraying the choice as an "economic, not a worker
safety, issue."
The new law bars Washington
from pursuing an ergonomics standard unless a federal one is passed.
In Minnesota, Democratic
senator Linda Higgins is sponsoring an ergonomics bill with the support of
labor unions. The bill, however, has no chance of becoming law.
Rhode Island was to
establish a special commission on ergonomics under a two year old
amendment to the state’s Workers Compensation Act, however, the
Republican governor never appointed members to the commission and it
expires this winter.
The only state with a
current ergonomics standard is California. It is a standard which needs
strengthening, though the possibilities of that seem slim. The state
AFL-CIO petitioned to strengthen the standard when Gray Davis was
governor, but the effort went nowhere. Things don’t look any better with
newly elected conservative Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. An executive
order issued by Schwarzenegger requires that all regulations undergo a
thorough analysis of their economic impact on business interests.
Michigan has established an
Ergonomics Steering Committee with representatives from labor and
industry. Labor representatives come from the Teamsters, UAW, UFCW, PACE,
SEIU and the state AFL-CIO.
Derrick Quinney represents
the Michigan AFL-CIO on the committee. "We’ve had two get
acquainted meetings and are trying to work out who and what a Michigan
standard would cover," says Quinney, who thinks a standard should
cover all workers. "Maybe it’s because I spent twenty-three years
in an assembly plant, but to me good ergonomics is good sense. It raises
morale and productivity, and it reduces injuries and costs. It’s a
win-win situation. I know people who have been through the surgeries and
the rehabilitation. No matter what they do, their quality of life is
wrecked. Corporations shouldn’t be able to use us up and throw us on the
trash heap." |